1963 NSU Prinz vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU Prinz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU Prinz would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1963 NSU Prinz. (30 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU Prinz.
Because 1963 NSU Prinz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU Prinz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 NSU Prinz | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | NSU | Ford |
Model | Prinz | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 583 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |