1963 NSU Wankel Spider vs. 2000 Volvo S60

To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (136 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. (50 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 NSU Wankel Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (290 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU Wankel Spider. 2000 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU Wankel Spider has manual transmission. 1963 NSU Wankel Spider will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 NSU Wankel Spider 2000 Volvo S60
Make NSU Volvo
Model Wankel Spider S60
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 1000 cc 2435 cc
Horse Power 50 HP 136 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 71 Nm 290 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.3:1
Top Speed 148 km/hour 200 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 700 kg 1490 kg
Vehicle Length 3640 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1530 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2030 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]