1963 Opel Rekord vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Opel Rekord (53 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Opel Rekord should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Opel Rekord weights approximately 200 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Opel Rekord (108 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Opel Rekord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Opel Rekord | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Opel | Zastava |
| Model | Rekord | 102 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2160 mm |
