1963 Opel Rekord vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Opel Rekord. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 Opel Rekord.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Opel Rekord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Opel Rekord | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Rekord | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |