1963 Opel Rekord vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1963 Opel Rekord. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Opel Rekord.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Opel Rekord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Opel Rekord. (108 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Opel Rekord | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Opel | Mazda |
Model | Rekord | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3010 mm |