1963 Opel Rekord vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Opel Rekord would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Opel Rekord. (108 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Opel Rekord | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Opel | Smart |
Model | Rekord | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 130 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1867 mm |