1963 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2002 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Rexton (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2002 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Plymouth Valiant | 2002 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Plymouth | SsangYong |
Model | Valiant | Rexton |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |