1963 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 217 kg more than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1963 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Plymouth Valiant | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Plymouth | Ford |
Model | Valiant | E-150 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3689 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2619 mm |