1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1968 Volvo 120 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP) has 228 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 400 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Pontiac Tempest | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Pontiac | Volvo |
| Model | Tempest | 120 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6376 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2610 mm |
