1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 610 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Pontiac | Subaru |
Model | Tempest | R2 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6376 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2370 mm |