1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (197 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 226 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Pontiac | Volvo |
Model | Tempest | C70 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3524 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2670 mm |