1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2005 Saturn L
To start off, 2005 Saturn L is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Saturn L. (182 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2005 Saturn L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saturn L weights approximately 118 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2005 Saturn L | |
| Make | Pontiac | Saturn |
| Model | Tempest | L |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5341 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1468 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2710 mm |
