1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. (295 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Pontiac | Holden |
| Model | Tempest | UTE |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6376 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 357 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
