1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Captiva. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Captiva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 320 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Pontiac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tempest | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6376 cc | 2405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2710 mm |
