1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza

To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cadenza. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cadenza. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 225 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.

Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 1963 Pontiac Tempest has manual transmission. 1963 Pontiac Tempest will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: