1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Kia Forte. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Forte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 122 kg more than 2010 Kia Forte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Pontiac | Kia |
Model | Tempest | Forte |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5341 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1775 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2649 mm |