1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 810 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Pontiac | Tata |
| Model | Tempest | Nano |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6376 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2230 mm |
