1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Camry. (187 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Camry weights approximately 259 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Pontiac | Toyota |
| Model | Tempest | Camry |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6376 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1669 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4806 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1821 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2776 mm |
