1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 101 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Pontiac | Volvo |
Model | Tempest | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3524 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2639 mm |