1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Bravo. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 130 kg more than 2011 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Pontiac | Fiat |
Model | Tempest | Bravo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6376 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2610 mm |