1963 Pontiac Tempest vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (165 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Pontiac Tempest | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Pontiac | Mazda |
Model | Tempest | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5341 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2640 mm |