1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 294 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Reliant Sabre Six 1978 Mazda Cosmo
Make Reliant Mazda
Model Sabre Six Cosmo
Year Released 1963 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2553 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 93 HP
Torque 185 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 80 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 798 kg 1092 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2520 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 65 L