1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (119 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Suzuki Baleno weights approximately 237 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Reliant | Suzuki |
| Model | Sabre Six | Baleno |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 798 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2390 mm |
