1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 1996 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1996 Toyota Carina is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Carina. (82 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Carina.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 1996 Toyota Carina | |
| Make | Reliant | Toyota |
| Model | Sabre Six | Carina |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 82 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1420 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
