1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Reliant | Ford |
| Model | Sabre Six | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |
