1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Musso (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Reliant | SsangYong |
| Model | Sabre Six | Musso |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 798 kg | 1876 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |
