1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Note weights approximately 254 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2009 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Reliant | Nissan |
| Model | Sabre Six | Note |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 798 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2600 mm |
