1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford S-Max (160 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Reliant | Ford |
Model | Sabre Six | S-Max |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |