1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (363 HP) has 255 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Reliant | Hummer |
| Model | Sabre Six | H3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 363 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
