1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A3 (158 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2011 Audi A3 | |
Make | Reliant | Audi |
Model | Sabre Six | A3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |