1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (168 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2012 Audi TT | |
| Make | Reliant | Audi |
| Model | Sabre Six | TT |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
