1963 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Reliant Sabre Six | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Reliant | Opel |
Model | Sabre Six | Combo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 185 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 73.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 52 L |