1963 Renault 4 vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 639 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Renault 4 | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Renault | Seat |
| Model | 4 | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2850 mm |
