1963 Renault 4 vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Smart ForTwo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 799 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Smart ForTwo (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 155 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Renault 4 | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Renault | Smart |
Model | 4 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 22 L |