1963 Renault 4 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Renault 4 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 4 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 87 L |
