1963 Renault 4 vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 747 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Renault 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForTwo (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 165 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Renault 4 | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Renault | Smart |
Model | 4 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 33 L |