1963 Renault 4 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1107 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Renault 4 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 4 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | LPG |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4955 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |