1963 Renault 8 vs. 1980 Toyota Century
To start off, 1980 Toyota Century is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Century (167 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Century should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Century weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Renault 8 | 1980 Toyota Century | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 8 | Century |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 3375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2870 mm |
