1963 Renault 8 vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1983 Ford Tempo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 370 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Renault 8 | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | 8 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2540 mm |
