1963 Renault 8 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Renault 8 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | 8 | 75 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2630 mm |