1963 Renault 8 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8.
Because 1963 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Renault 8 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | 8 | Micra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 79 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 46 L |