1963 Renault 8 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 525 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Renault 8 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Renault | Chevrolet |
| Model | 8 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 572 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2852 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 72 L |
