1963 Renault Floride vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault Floride. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault Floride would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1963 Renault Floride. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault Floride.
Because 1963 Renault Floride is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Renault Floride. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Renault Floride | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | Floride | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2490 mm |
