1963 Riley 4 vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 1982 Audi 4000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley 4 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi 4000 (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1963 Riley 4. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley 4.
Because 1982 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Riley 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi 4000 (137 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley 4. (121 Nm). This means 1982 Audi 4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Riley 4 | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Riley | Audi |
Model | 4 | 4000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2550 mm |