1963 Riley 4 vs. 2013 Ford Focus
To start off, 2013 Ford Focus is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley 4 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Focus (158 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1963 Riley 4. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Focus weights approximately 186 kg more than 1963 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Riley 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Riley 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Focus (198 Nm @ 4450 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Riley 4 | 2013 Ford Focus | |
Make | Riley | Ford |
Model | 4 | Focus |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4450 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 12.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1148 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4534 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1466 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |