1963 Riley Elf vs. 2010 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley Elf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley Elf would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Freelander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1963 Riley Elf. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley Elf.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley Elf. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley Elf.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Riley Elf | 2010 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Riley | Land Rover |
Model | Elf | Freelander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 16.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 122 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2670 mm |