1963 Riley One-Point-Five vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 228 more horse power than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 640 kg more than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Riley One-Point-Five is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Riley One-Point-Five | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Riley | Kia |
Model | One-Point-Five | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2845 mm |