1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2003 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2003 Renault Grand Espace is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 200 kg more than 2003 Renault Grand Espace.
Because 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Espace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2003 Renault Grand Espace | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Renault |
Model | Silver Cloud | Grand Espace |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6229 cc | 2187 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 83 L |