1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2006 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2006 Saab 9-7X is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 575 kg more than 2006 Saab 9-7X.
Because 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Saab 9-7X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2006 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Saab |
Model | Silver Cloud | 9-7X |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6229 cc | 4195 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 291 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 83 L |