1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 34 kg more than 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Silver Cloud | ML |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2913 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 95 L |
